• Users Online: 356
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 
Table of Contents
TECHNICAL NOTE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 130-134

Prolonging the shelf life of homemade gelatin ultrasound phantoms


1 AU/UGA Medical Partnership, Athens, Georgia, USA
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA

Date of Submission16-Sep-2021
Date of Decision22-Nov-2021
Date of Acceptance07-Dec-2021
Date of Web Publication25-May-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Kimberly M Rathbun
1425, Prince Avenue, Russell Hall, Room 215D, Athens, GA 30602
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jmu.jmu_179_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


A significant limitation of homemade phantoms is shelf life. Our goal was to compare the impact on shelf life of easily obtained additives. Fifteen additives were mixed into a gelatin-psyllium hydrophilic mucilloid fiber phantom; three of these additives were used as a layer on top of the phantom. The mixtures were stored in the refrigerator and at room temperature. The samples were evaluated daily for microbial growth and phantom degradation. A 4% of chlorhexidine gluconate layer on top of the phantom quickly made the phantom unusable. The addition of benzoic acid and bleach to the mixture negatively affected phantom appearance with ultrasound imaging. The addition of household bleach or 4% chlorhexidine gluconate to the mixture or a 10% povidone-iodine layer on top of the phantom was the best way to preserve samples stored at room temperature. The refrigerated sample outlasted the paired room temperature sample in every case, with most room temperature samples becoming unusable by day 10 and most refrigerated samples lasting past 50 days.

Keywords: Education, phantom preservation, simulation, ultrasound phantom


How to cite this article:
Rathbun KM, Harryman CF, Re AT. Prolonging the shelf life of homemade gelatin ultrasound phantoms. J Med Ultrasound 2022;30:130-4

How to cite this URL:
Rathbun KM, Harryman CF, Re AT. Prolonging the shelf life of homemade gelatin ultrasound phantoms. J Med Ultrasound [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 1];30:130-4. Available from: http://www.jmuonline.org/text.asp?2022/30/2/130/346045




  Introduction Top


Correctly using ultrasound as a diagnostic tool requires significant training. The use of ultrasound-simulation models (i.e., phantoms) allows users to gain experience in seeing normal and abnormal findings before performing ultrasound scans on patients. In addition, ultrasound-guided procedures require expertise and coordination which can be gained through practice on phantoms.[1] There are many commercially available phantoms, but these are often cost-prohibitive and are not customizable. As a result, a large number of homemade phantoms have been created to mimic a variety of anatomical structures and pathologic conditions. Phantoms are constructed using a variety of materials, but a gelatin-psyllium hydrophilic mucilloid fiber mixture is the most common.

One of the main limitations of homemade phantoms is longevity. If left uncovered at room temperature, phantoms can last from a few days to a few weeks.[2],[3] Gelatin-psyllium hydrophilic mucilloid fiber phantoms will desiccate over time, but the main limitation to long-term use is microbial growth on or within the phantom.[4] Several studies have tried using refrigeration, which can increase the use of phantoms from around 2 days to 1–2 months.[2],[3],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10] Other studies have used additives in their preparations. Many of these additives, such as phenol,[11],[12] formalin,[5] thimerosal,[13],[14] benzalkonium chloride,[15] and merthiolate,[16] are expensive, toxic, difficult to obtain, and require special equipment (such as fume hoods) for safe use. Some safer and more easily obtainable additives such as betadine,[3] chlorhexidine,[17],[18],[19] and ethanol[20] have been used. In particular, Zerth et al. showed longevity of over 2 months with the combination of betadine and refrigeration.

Because many of the gelatin-psyllium hydrophilic mucilloid fiber phantoms are made in home kitchens, we examine the effect on phantom longevity of several inexpensive and easily accessible additives within a gelatin-psyllium hydrophilic mucilloid fiber-based medium stored at room temperature and in refrigeration.


  Materials and Methods Top


This study was exempt from ethical approval and informed consent. To make the phantom samples, 100 mL water was combined with one tablespoon of unflavored gelatin (Equate, Bentonville, AR), stirred until gelatin was suspended, and heated over low heat until the gelatin dissolved. Then, one tablespoon of sugar-free psyllium hydrophilic mucilloid fiber (Equate, Bentonville, AR) was added and stirred until evenly suspended. This mixture was used as a control. To create experimental samples, additives were combined with 100 mL of the gelatin-psyllium hydrophilic mucilloid fiber mixture as listed in [Table 1]. The 100 mL mixture containing the additive was divided into two 2 Oz plastic containers with tightly sealing lids. One was kept at room temperature ~22°C (Sample #) and one was kept in a kitchen refrigerator at ~4°C (Sample #R). Both samples were stored and covered with lids. All samples were checked daily to evaluate for microbial growth or degradation. The planned observation period was 30 days but was extended to 50 days because the refrigerated samples had not begun to degrade or show any microbial growth at 30 days.
Table 1: List of additives including amount of additive used and manufacturer

Click here to view


Ultrasound evaluation of the samples was performed using a Zonare Z.One Pro machine with a linear probe with a frequency range of 3–8 megahertz (model L8-3).


  Results Top


Some of the additives changed the color of the phantom [Figure 1]; color change did not correspond to a change in the quality of ultrasound image [Figure 2]. Three additives affected the composition of the phantom: benzoic acid (#3/#3R), bleach (#9/#9R), and 4% chlorhexidine gluconate layer (#18/#18R). The benzoic acid (#3/#3R) did not dissolve well in the gelatin-psyllium mixture and created large clumps of material suspended in the colloid which were visible on ultrasound imaging [Figure 2]. The addition of bleach (#9/#9R) to the colloid created air bubbles that significantly limited ultrasound imaging [Figure 2]. The 4% of chlorhexidine gluconate layer (#18/#18R) dissolved and liquified the phantom making it unusable before the first observation point. While magnesium sulfate (#16/#16R) did not dissolve easily and left visible clumps in the colloid, these clumps did not affect ultrasound imaging [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Gross appearance of samples mixed with additives

Click here to view
Figure 2: Sonographic appearance of samples mixed with additives

Click here to view


Most of the room temperature samples were unusable by day 10 of observation. The first room temperature samples to show microbial growths were Ball fruit-fresh (#12) and magnesium sulfate (#16), both on day 4 [Figure 3]. Room temperature 50% isopropyl alcohol (#14) had growth the following day. Both room temperature control samples (#1, #20) followed shortly afterward, with growth on days 6 and 7, respectively. These were rapidly followed by microbial growth on samples containing ascorbic acid (#2), benzoic acid (#3), citric acid (#4), potassium sorbate (#5), 10% povidone-iodine (#6), 0.13% benzalkonium chloride mixed (#8), distilled white vinegar 5% acidity (#10), 70% isopropyl alcohol (#13), 10% acetone (#15), and 0.13% benzalkonium chloride topped (#19), all perishing into foul smelly gelatin over the next 3 days. Room temperature table salt mixture (#11) had white growth on the 11th day of observation. The three remaining room temperature phantoms (household bleach [#9], 10% povidone-iodine topped [#17], and 4% chlorhexidine gluconate mixed [#7]) lasted the longest, eventually decaying on days 20, 24, and 33, respectively.
Figure 3: Days until samples showed microbial growth (room temperature [gray] compared to refrigerated [black]). Sample #18 and #18R were unusable due to degradation by the chlorhexidine gluconate layer. Refrigerated samples lasted significantly longer than paired room-temperature samples (46.5 days, standard deviation 11.2 vs. 9.7 days, standard deviation 7.6) (P < 0.001)

Click here to view


In all 19 usable sample pairs, the mean usable days of the refrigerated phantoms (9.7, standard deviation 7.6) was significantly longer than the corresponding phantom stored at room temperature (46.5, standard deviation 11.2) (P < 0.001). A refrigerated control (#1R), as well as refrigerated table salt (#11R), were the first samples to decay on day 43. The phantom containing 70% of isopropyl alcohol (#13R) was the only other refrigerated specimen to develop microbial growth, doing so on day 44. By the end of 50 days of observation, the refrigerated phantoms had dehydrated to the point that they were no longer usable, and thus measurement was discontinued.


  Discussion Top


Phantoms are used for teaching a variety of ultrasound skills and pathologies. Commercial phantoms exist but are expensive. Many inexpensive homemade phantoms have been created, but they take time to create and do not have a long shelf life. Extending the lifespan of these phantoms would give educators more flexibility in the timing of making the phantoms before a session as well as potentially allowing the reuse of phantoms for multiple sessions that are spread over time. Several solutions for prolonging the lifespans of these phantoms have been mentioned in publications detailing the construction of phantoms,[2],[3],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10] but there has been no direct comparison of preservation methods. We examined the effect on phantom longevity of several inexpensive and easily accessible additives within a gelatin-psyllium hydrophilic mucilloid fiber-based medium at room temperature and under refrigeration. These additives were chosen because they are easily accessible, inexpensive, and safe to use in a home kitchen.

Refrigeration was the main factor in prolonging the lifespan of the phantoms. Refrigerated samples lasted for well over a month, vastly outlasting their nonrefrigerated counterparts. Even the least perishable of the room temperature phantom samples could not outlast the most perishable of the refrigerated samples. Thus, refrigeration is largely necessary if the use of phantom is planned for 3 weeks or more after its creation. If refrigeration is impossible, room temperature storage of phantoms created with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate or topped with a layer of 10% povidone-iodine can prolong the shelf life of a phantom for at least 24 days. However, it is possible that the change in color delayed the observer's ability to recognize microbial growth on these phantoms, creating a source of error. Bleach also allowed the phantom to last longer at room temperature, but it created small air bubbles that blocked ultrasound wave transmission, thus making the phantom unusable.

While refrigeration prolongs the usability of the phantoms, these appliances create dehumidifying conditions which can cause the phantoms to desiccate leading to degradation of the quality of ultrasound imaging that can be obtained with them. Our study utilized tight-fitting lids on all 40 samples to reduce the effects of desiccation as well as contamination. Condensation was observed on the lids of all refrigerated samples by the end of the 1st month of observation, suggesting that the phantoms were beginning to dry out. Without the lids, it is likely that the phantoms will desiccate more quickly. For smaller phantoms that easily fit into containers with lids, this may not provide such a large obstacle. However, for larger or oddly shaped phantoms, obtaining lids for protection against the effects of desiccation may not be feasible.

This study has several limitations. Our phantoms were covered and stored immediately after creation. It is not known how the use of phantom for an educational session will affect microbial growth. Presumably, the use of phantom would accelerate microbial growth, limiting the interval it can be stored before subsequent use. In addition, we did not evaluate the effect of various concentrations of the additives on shelf life. The concentrations that we used in this study far exceeded the typical concentrations that are used when these compounds are added to food.


  Conclusion Top


We have shown that refrigeration is the best way to preserve gelatin-psyllium hydrophilic mucilloid fiber ultrasound phantoms, extending the life of the phantom for close to 6 weeks with many additives extending this even longer. When refrigeration is not possible, adding 4% chlorhexidine gluconate to the phantom mixture or topping the phantom with a layer of 10% povidone-iodine can allow the phantom to last at least 3 weeks.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Wang EE, Quinones J, Fitch MT, Dooley-Hash S, Griswold-Theodorson S, Medzon R, et al. Developing technical expertise in emergency medicine – The role of simulation in procedural skill acquisition. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:1046-57.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
McNamara MP Jr., McNamara ME. Preparation of a homemade ultrasound biopsy phantom. J Clin Ultrasound 1989;17:456-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Zerth H, Harwood R, Tommaso L, Girzadas DV Jr. An inexpensive, easily constructed, reusable task trainer for simulating ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis. J Emerg Med 2012;43:1066-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Culjat MO, Goldenberg D, Tewari P, Singh RS. A review of tissue substitutes for ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010;36:861-73.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Nicholson RA, Crofton M. Training phantom for ultrasound guided biopsy. Br J Radiol 1997;70:192-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Morehouse H, Thaker HP, Persaud C. Addition of Metamucil to gelatin for a realistic breast biopsy phantom. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:1123-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Richardson C, Bernard S, Dinh VA. A cost-effective, gelatin-based phantom model for learning ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration procedures of the head and neck. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34:1479-84.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Soucy ZP, Mills L, Rose JS, Kelley K, Ramirez F, Kuppermann N. Creation of a high-fidelity, Low-cost pediatric skull fracture ultrasound phantom. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34:1473-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bude RO, Adler RS. An easily made, low-cost, tissue-like ultrasound phantom material. J Clin Ultrasound 1995;23:271-3.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Sutcliffe J, Hardman RL, Dornbluth NC, Kist KA. A novel technique for teaching challenging ultrasound-guided breast procedures to radiology residents. J Ultrasound Med 2013;32:1845-54.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Silver B, Metzger TS, Matalon TA. A simple phantom for learning needle placement for sonographically guided biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:847-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Tanious SF, Cline J, Cavin J, Davidson N, Coleman JK, Goodmurphy CW. Shooting with sound: Optimizing an affordable ballistic gelatin recipe in a graded ultrasound phantom education program. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34:1011-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Nattagh K, Siauw T, Pouliot J, Hsu IC, Cunha JA. A training phantom for ultrasound-guided needle insertion and suturing. Brachytherapy 2014;13:413-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Madsen EL, Frank GR, Dong F. Liquid or solid ultrasonically tissue-mimicking materials with very low scatter. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998;24:535-42.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
King DM, Ring M, Moran CM, Browne JE. Development of a range of anatomically realistic renal artery flow phantoms. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010;36:1135-44.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Carrig CB, Pyle RL. Anatomic models and phantoms for diagnostic ultrasound instruction. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2001;42:320-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Li JW, Karmakar MK, Li X, Kwok WH, Ngan Kee WD. Gelatin-agar lumbosacral spine phantom: A simple model for learning the basic skills required to perform real-time sonographically guided central neuraxial blocks. J Ultrasound Med 2011;30:263-72.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Omar AM, Khattak AQ, Amirzadah PJ. Novel homemade trans-rectal ultrasound biopsy training phantom. Curr Urol 2008;2:97-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
McCreesh K, Adusumilli P, Evans T, Riley S, Davies A, Lewis J. Validation of ultrasound measurement of the subacromial space using a novel shoulder phantom model. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014;40:1729-33.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Cuévas Gonzales JL. Low cost ocular ultrasound phantom for the training in the diagnosis of the emergency eye pathology. Crit Ultrasound J 2012;4 Suppl 1:A26.  Back to cited text no. 20
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed144    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded12    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal