• Users Online: 543
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

Table of Contents
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 302-304

Cesarean section scar nodule, ovarian cyst, and dysmenorrhea

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Professor Fernando da Fonseca, Amadora, Lisbon, Portugal
2 Department of Reproductive Medicine, Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, Valencia, Spain; Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centro Hospitalar Médio Ave, Famalicão, Portugal
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Lusíadas Porto, Porto, Portugal

Date of Submission04-May-2020
Date of Decision17-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance07-Aug-2020
Date of Web Publication01-Oct-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Pedro Brandão
Department of Reproductive Medicine, Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, Plaza de la Policia Local 3, 46015 Valencia

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_71_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Goncalves-Henriques M, Brandão P, Almeida A, Ramôa P. Cesarean section scar nodule, ovarian cyst, and dysmenorrhea. J Med Ultrasound 2021;29:302-4

How to cite this URL:
Goncalves-Henriques M, Brandão P, Almeida A, Ramôa P. Cesarean section scar nodule, ovarian cyst, and dysmenorrhea. J Med Ultrasound [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 11];29:302-4. Available from: http://www.jmuonline.org/text.asp?2021/29/4/302/297129

[TAG:2]Section 2 – Answer [/TAG:2]

Case description

A 38-year-old female with secondary infertility started complaining of severe dysmenorrhea after leaving the combined pill in order to conceive. Physical examination revealed a hard and painful nodule at mid-line on the abdominal wall, beneath the cesarean section scar, a fix uterus, and a painful hard mass rectal digital examination, 3 cm away from the anus. Abdominal wall soft tissue ultrasound revealed a nodule of heterogeneous echogenicity with 41 mm × 34 mm × 17 mm located medially at the level of the rectus abdominis muscle, under the C-section scar [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the presence of a nodule with 4.9 cm × 3.8 cm × 2.0 cm on the rectus abdominis muscle and its fascia [Figure 4] and [Figure 5]. Pelvic transvaginal ultrasound revealed normal uterus and right adnexa and a cyst at the left ovary with 30 mm × 26 mm, with no septa or solid components and with ground glass echogenicity.
Figure 1: Abdominal soft tissue ultrasound in the axial plane revealing abdominal wall nodule

Click here to view
Figure 2: Abdominal soft tissue ultrasound in the sagittal plane revealing abdominal wall nodule

Click here to view
Figure 3: Abdominal soft tissue ultrasound in the axial plane with color Doppler revealing vascularized abdominal wall nodule

Click here to view
Figure 4: Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging in the axial plane revealing abdominal wall nodule

Click here to view
Figure 5: Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging in sagital plane revealing abdominal wall nodule

Click here to view

A 5 cm hard mass was surgically removed from the rectus abdominis muscle and fascia [Figure 6] and [Figure 7]. Several pelvic adhesions were present destroying completely the pelvic anatomy. An ovarian cyst at the left adnexa with dark brown liquid inside and an enlarged left  Fallopian tube More Details were removed.
Figure 6: Hard median nodule involving both rectus abdominis muscles and fascia (in vivo picture).

Click here to view
Figure 7: Hard median nodule with 5 cm length removed from the rectus abdominis muscles and fascia (ex vivo picture).

Click here to view

What is the Diagnosis?


This patient complained of severe dysmenorrhea after stopping oral pill using and had a secondary infertility. At physical examination, 2 hard and firm nodules were detected, one pelvic and other under previous cesarean section scar. These clinical findings together with her symptoms were highly suggestive of endometriosis. The patient was submitted to laparotomy and both nodule and ovarian cyst were removed. Histological examination of the specimens revealed endometriosis.

Endometriosis is a chronic disease affecting almost 10% of women. It is defined as the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue in any part of the body. Its exact physiopathology is unknown, some say it is due to retrograde menses, genetic predisposition, but many other theories have been proposed so far.[1] The most common sites of endometriotic implants are the ovaries (endometrioma), pelvic peritoneum (superficial endometriosis), the recto-vaginal septum, and the uterosacral ligaments (deep infiltrative endometriosis [DIE]). Women with previous cesarean sections may develop nodules of endometriosis underneath the scar.[2] Even though extremely rare, there are reports of abdominal wall endometriosis without previous surgeries.[3] The main symptoms of endometriosis are pain and infertility. A wide variety of pain may be caused by this disorder, including dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, or pain at the site of the disease.[4] Infertility is thought to be associated with pelvic anatomy distortion due to adhesions, especially if affecting the Fallopian tubes, and the pro-inflammatory status caused by the ectopic tissue that can be harmful to oocytes, embryos, and normal endometrium.[5]

The diagnosis of endometriosis is based on clinical findings and may be complement with imagiological examinations targeting the affected area. The gold standard imagiologic examinations are pelvic ultrasound and MRI, with good overall sensitivity, especially for endometriomas (with the typical heterogeneous echogenicity – ground-glass appearance) and DIE.[6] The sensitivity of these examinations for superficial peritoneal nodules is much lower due to the usual small size (<3 mm) of these lesions. In cases of abdominal scar endometriosis, both soft tissue ultrasound and MRI are reasonable alternatives to support the diagnosis. These lesions usually appear as heterogeneous, mostly hypoechoic, solid, irregular round, or oval nodules.[7] Definitive diagnosis is based on histological examination of the specimens through surgical intervention like laparoscopy. One must keep in mind that the differential diagnosis with other entities may not be easy, including malignancy.[8]

The treatment of endometriosis is directed to pain control and management of the infertility, sometimes resorting to assisted reproductive treatments.[9] In severe or refractory cases, surgery may be indicated. As a hormone dependent disorder, endometriosis tends to be controlled by ovarian inhibition, such as during pregnancy, after menopause or with any medication blocking the hypothalamus–pituitary–ovary axis, such as the combined pill, progestin-based therapies, or GnRh agonists.[10]

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that her name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Rolla E. Endometriosis: Advances and controversies in classification, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. F1000Res 2019;8.  Back to cited text no. 1
Karapolat B, Kucuk H. A rare cause of abdominal pain: Scar endometriosis. Emerg Med Int 2019;2019:2584652.  Back to cited text no. 2
Adolfo D, Brandão P, Ramôa P, Almeida A. Umbilical endometriosis in a patient without abdominal surgery. Obstet Gynecol Int J 2018;9:326-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
Alimi Y, Iwanaga J, Loukas M, Tubbs RS. The clinical anatomy of endometriosis: A review. Cureus 2018;10:e3361.  Back to cited text no. 4
Tomassetti C, D'Hooghe T. Endometriosis and infertility: Insights into the causal link and management strategies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018;51:25-33.  Back to cited text no. 5
de Almeida A, Fernandes LF, Averbach M, Abrão MS. Disc resection is the first option in the management of rectal endometriosis for unifocal lesions with less than 3 centimeters of longitudinal diameter. Surg Technol Int 2014;24:243-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
Grigore M, Socolov D, Pavaleanu I, Scripcariu I, Grigore AM, Micu R. Abdominal wall endometriosis: An update in clinical, imagistic features, and management options. Med Ultrason 2017;19:430-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
Ferrandina G, Palluzzi E, Fanfani F, Gentileschi S, Valentini AL, Mattoli MV, et al. Endometriosis-associated clear cell carcinoma arising in caesarean section scar: A case report and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol 2016;14:300.  Back to cited text no. 8
Garrido N, Bellver J, Remohí J, Simón C, Pellicer A. Cumulative live-birth rates per total number of embryos needed to reach newborn in consecutive in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles: A new approach to measuring the likelihood of IVF success. Fertil Steril 2011;96:40-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
Garcia-Velasco JA, Quea G. Medical treatment of endometriosis. Minerva Ginecol 2005;57:249-55.  Back to cited text no. 10


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
Section 2 –...
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded95    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal