• Users Online: 292
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 92-96

A prospective evaluation of point of care ultrasound teaching in Switzerland


1 School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
3 University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Date of Submission05-May-2018
Date of Acceptance28-Sep-2018
Date of Web Publication26-Feb-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Shadi Lahham
333 The City Boulevard West, Suite 640, Rt 128-01, Orange, CA
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_57_18

Get Permissions

  Abstract 

Context: As the utility of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) continues to expand in the medical field, there is a need for effective educational methods. In Switzerland, medical education follows the European model and lasts 6 years, focusing on preclinical training during the first 2 years. No previous studies have evaluated the optimal time for teaching ultrasound in European medical education. Aims: The aim of this study is to provide ultrasound training to medical students in Switzerland at varying times during their clinical training to determine if the level of training plays a role in their ability to comprehend and to apply basic POCUS skills. Methods: We performed an observational study utilizing a convenience sample of Swiss medical students between July 11, 2016 and August 6, 2016. They were taught a 2-day POCUS course by five American-trained 1st-year medical students. Following this course, students were evaluated with written and clinical examination. Results: 100 Swiss medical students were enrolled in the study. A total of 59 of these students were early clinical students, and 41 students were late clinical students. A two-tailed t-test was performed and demonstrated that the late clinical students performed better than the early clinical students on the written assessment; however, no difference was found in clinical skill. Conclusion: Our data suggest that Swiss medical students can learn and perform POCUS after a 2-day instructional taught by trained 1st-year American medical students. No difference was found between students in early clinical training and late clinical training for the ability to perform POCUS.

Keywords: Medical education, Switzerland, ultrasound teaching


How to cite this article:
Byrne C, Kahl N, Knight B, Lee M, Morley S, Lahham S, Bingisser R, Thompson M, Shniter I, Valdes V, Fox JC. A prospective evaluation of point of care ultrasound teaching in Switzerland. J Med Ultrasound 2019;27:92-6

How to cite this URL:
Byrne C, Kahl N, Knight B, Lee M, Morley S, Lahham S, Bingisser R, Thompson M, Shniter I, Valdes V, Fox JC. A prospective evaluation of point of care ultrasound teaching in Switzerland. J Med Ultrasound [serial online] 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 20];27:92-6. Available from: http://www.jmuonline.org/text.asp?2019/27/2/92/252984


  Introduction Top


Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a cost-effective, minimally invasive imaging modality. It has a wide array of practical uses across a breadth of medical specialties, and it has been suggested that ultrasound is included in all standard physical examinations to aid physicians in their diagnoses.[1],[2],[3] In addition, including ultrasound in medical education has been shown to later boost physicians' confidence in performing bedside examinations.[4] As the utility of POCUS continues to expand in the medical field, there is an increasing need for effective educational methods to teach medical students the necessary skill set to master POCUS.

Previous studies have shown variable success and implementation in teaching curriculums.[5],[6],[7] Bahner et al. demonstrated that the integration of ultrasound into curricula is highly variable and is in need of standardization.[8] A comprehensive study of ultrasound education at Wayne State University has shown that medical students had positive experiences and better outcomes with the inclusion of ultrasound in their medical education.[9] In addition, a 2010 study conducted by surgeons and medical researchers in the United Kingdom demonstrated that the focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) scan can be effectively taught to inexperienced medical students with significant success.[10] Although the benefit of including ultrasound education in the medical school curriculum has been well established, there has been limited research as to the most effective time to teach POCUS during medical students' training.[11] There have been various curriculum models proposed; however, the various cost and benefits of these differing models have not fully been assessed.[12] Furthermore, the model of peer-to-peer teaching has not been fully evaluated.

In Switzerland, medical education follows the European model and lasts 6 years, focusing on preclinical training during the first 2 years, and focusing on clinical training thereafter. Currently, medical education in Switzerland is devoid of any ultrasound training despite recommendations by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.[13] This environment allows comparing ultrasound education between Swiss medical students given ultrasound training in the early clinical training period (year 3/4) as compared to during the late clinical training period (year 5/6). The aim of this study is to determine if 1st-year American medical students with minimal ultrasound training can teach ultrasound to medical students in Switzerland at varying times during their clinical training. A secondary objective is to determine if the level of training plays a role in their ability to comprehend and apply basic POCUS skills.


  Methods Top


Study design

We performed an observational study utilizing a convenience sample of volunteer Swiss medical students between July 11, 2016 and August 6, 2016. All students provided written consent for the study. No financial compensation was provided for participation. The study was approved by the site Institutional Review Board. The study took place at the University of Basel Medical School at the hospital's training site.

Study protocol

We recruited five American-trained 1st-year medical students who consented for study enrollment. All students had completed an entire 1st year of medical education which included human physiology, human anatomy, and basic ultrasound. Before initiation of study enrollment, each student needed to demonstrate the ability to obtain the four required cardiac views including parasternal long-axis view, parasternal short-axis view, apical four-chamber view, and subxiphoid view. Students were required to pass a certification exam given by the institution's POCUS director. Students also needed to be able to identify anatomy for the remainder of the FAST scan including the hepatorenal recess, splenorenal recess, and bladder views.[14] We asked these instructors to demonstrate an ability to identify all important structures of the FAST scan to be considered qualified to teach POCUS. We performed both instruction and image acquisition using four SonoSite NanoMaxx (SonoSite Inc, Bothell WA) ultrasound machines. Each ultrasound machine was equipped with a phased array probe operating at a frequency of 1–5 MHz.

Intervention

We gave Swiss medical students at various levels of training the opportunity to voluntarily enroll in the study as an elective learning course in addition to their curriculum. All Swiss medical students were offered the opportunity to enroll in the study through an e-mail to the entire student body. The students were separated into two groups. The first group consisted of 3rd and 4th-year Swiss medical students. These students had completed basic science courses as well as basic anatomy but had minimal clinical exposure. The second group of students included 5th- and 6th-year medical students. These students had completed all basic science requirements and were involved in clinical elective rotations. All students in this category had completed internal medicine, general surgery, pediatrics, and emergency medicine.

Students who enrolled in the study were required to take part in a 2-day ultrasound training workshop. We held a total of four ultrasound training sessions. Each training session began with a written pretest, which was then followed by a 1-hr classroom lecture, designed to prepare the students for their hands-on training sessions. A board-certified Swiss Emergency Physician with ultrasound training was present to ensure the accuracy of training and answer any questions. For the hands-on training, we divided the students into groups of four and completed a hands-on pre-test to obtain all components of a FAST examination with a 5-min time limit each.

Ultrasound curriculum

The initial training session began with a 30-min instructional lecture on ultrasound technical handling (termed “knobology”). Next, students underwent a 60-min instructional lecture on the FAST examination, basic cardiac anatomy. Examples of normal anatomy and pathology were shown in leach lecture. Following didactic instructions, all participants practiced hands-on FAST ultrasound techniques under the direct supervision of one of the medical student instructors for 90-min duration. Instruction began with hepatorenal views followed by splenorenal, cardiac, and bladder views. The remainder of the instructional time was spent practicing POCUS techniques which included image acquisition and image optimization. Techniques included modifications in gain, depth, and image quality. Following instruction, the final hour and a half of the 2-day workshop were spent performing both a written and hands-on posttest. All scans were performed on healthy volunteers. All students were given the same written assessment of general ultrasound use and instructed to perform a practical hands-on demonstration of FAST and cardiac ultrasound examinations before and after the teaching session. Assessment was made in real time, and the students' scores were recorded on standardized data collection sheets. Images were saved on the portable ultrasound machines, and image accuracy was confirmed by the blinded board-certified Swiss Emergency Physician with ultrasound training. Competency was defined as scoring >70% on the examinations.

Data collection and statistics

All POCUS images and videos were recorded to evaluate the students' ultrasound skills. These images were then reviewed and graded based on appropriate probe selection, orientation, image quality, and accuracy of image interpretation. After grading images and compiling scores, images and videos were erased. Researchers stratified the data from the pre- and post-tests based on the years of medical training (Group 1: students in years 3 and 4; Group 2: students in year 5 and 6). Researchers used this information to determine the averages for the pre- and post-test scores of the groups to determine the effectiveness of the workshop. The improvement in mean written and practical examination scores was analyzed with a two-tailed t-test for comparison of pre- and post-clinical year students using a P = 0.025 to determine significance. The posttest means of all the groups were then compared to determine which group was able to most effectively learn from the workshop. A one-way ANOVA test was used for this portion of the analysis, using a P = 0.05 to determine significance. To determine the students' scores during the pre- and post-test assessments, a scoring rubric was used to quantify performance. The scoring rubric is shown in [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Practical examination: Cardiac ultrasound

Click here to view
Figure 2: Practical examination: Focused assessment with sonography in trauma ultrasound

Click here to view



  Results Top


A total of 100 Swiss medical students were enrolled in the study. 59 of these students were Group 1 (year 3/4), and 41 students were in Group 2 (year 5/6) [Table 1]. A two-tailed t-test was performed and demonstrated that the late clinical students (year 5/6) performed marginally better than the early clinical students (year 3/4) on the written assessment both before and after the teaching sessions (P < 0.025). This was the only significant difference found in between the groups at any point in the study. Maximum score for the written test was 15.
Table 1: Illustration of written test before 2-day point of care ultrasound course and after 2-day point of care ultrasound course for early and late clinical Swiss students

Click here to view


For the hands-on practical assessment of the cardiac and FAST bedside examination, both early and late clinical groups did not show significant differences in performances before or after the teaching session [Table 2]. After the teaching session, the late clinical students scored an average of 11.74 points (out of a maximum 13) for the cardiac examination and 9.5 (out of a maximum 14) points for the FAST examination. The early clinical students averaged 11.19 points for the cardiac examination and 9.09 points for the FAST examination after the teaching session. While both groups individually improved significantly from their presession baseline scores, the final scores were exceedingly similar.
Table 2: Illustration of cardiac and focused assessment with sonography in trauma ultrasound skills before and after 2 day point of care ultrasound course

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The main findings of our study were that POCUS can be taught to medical students in a peer to peer fashion and that there is no difference in knowledge acquisition between early clinical students and late clinical students. The study evaluated a large sample size of Swiss medical students with no prior formal education with English competency trained by American 1st-year medical students. While it may seem that later clinical students would perform better in the practical assessment of FAST and cardiac bedside ultrasound, we were unable to determine any significant difference between the performance of students in early or late clinical training. Both groups improved significantly, however.

Ultimately, both groups scored well enough to indicate competency in the FAST and cardiac ultrasound examinations (Group 1: FAST = 9.09/14, cardiac = 11.19/13; Group 2: FAST = 9.5/14, cardiac = 11.74/13). This suggests that students in their early clinical training can effectively learn FAST and cardiac bedside POCUS as effectively as their counterparts in late clinical training, indicating that ultrasound can be incorporated into medical education at whichever time is most convenient for each school's curriculum. Their similar increases in pre- to post-test score indicate that they acquired a comparable amount of knowledge over the 2-day workshop, and the similarity of their final scores indicate that both groups were equally able to achieve a high level of competency of the scans.

In the written assessment, we found that students in late clinical training outperformed students in the early clinical years in both the pre-and post-tests. We attributed this finding to the higher probability that students with late clinical training have additional medical education and clinical experience which gives them a larger base of knowledge to draw on for the written test, which was multiple choice. That being said, a written test is not as good an indicator of ultrasound ability as a practical one, but has the advantage of a knowledge focus.

This apparent equality in ability of early and late clinical Swiss medical students to learn POCUS could be very useful for determining at which time point to incorporate ultrasound education into American medical school curricula. The value of integrating ultrasound POCUS into undergraduate medical education is being increasingly recognized, and given the need for national guidelines in American ultrasound education, this study aims to determine when would be the most effective time to learn POCUS.[5],[6],[15],[16],[17] While there are some studies that illustrate the use of peer-to-peer educational programs in medical school, there are relatively few studies on medical students teaching ultrasound to other medical students.[18],[19] Further investigation is needed into this concept. Potential future studies could include an assessment of long-term retention of the skills and knowledge obtained, to find differences between students of different levels of experience. If there is a difference, the most appropriate time point to start ultrasound education could better further characterized.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, there are many differences in curriculum models between Swiss and American medical schools. Swiss medical school contains pre-clinical years, then early and late medical, educational years. Thus, this difference may affect the performance of Swiss preclinical students and make these conclusions less generalizable to American preclinical students. This model has appeared to be effective with Swiss medical students. It is unclear if similar results would be achieved in other European countries. In addition, it is unclear if there would have been better knowledge acquisition if expert sonographers were used to each ultrasound. Long-term knowledge was not formally tested in this study. Additional studies must be performed to determine the minimum amount of training required to be an instructor and the retention rate of ultrasound knowledge.


  Conclusion Top


Our data suggest that Swiss medical students can learn and perform cardiac and FAST ultrasound after a 2-day instructional course taught by trained 1st-year American medical students. In addition, no difference was found between students in their early clinical training and late clinical training for the ability to perform and to interpret FAST and cardiac POCUS.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 2011;364:749-57.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Frederiksen CA, Juhl-Olsen P, Sloth E. Advances in imaging: Ultrasound in every physician's pocket. Expert Opin Med Diagn 2012;6:167-70.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Siepel T, Clifford DS, James PA, Cowan TM. The ultrasound-assisted physical examination in the periodic health evaluation of the elderly. J Fam Pract 2000;49:628-32.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Fox JC, Schlang JR, Maldonado G, Lotfipour S, Clayman RV. Proactive medicine: The “UCI 30,” an ultrasound-based clinical initiative from the University of California, Irvine. Acad Med 2014;89:984-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000292.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Dinh VA, Fu JY, Lu S, Chiem A, Fox JC, Blaivas M, et al. Integration of ultrasound in medical education at United States medical schools: A National Survey of Directors' Experiences. J Ultrasound Med 2016;35:413-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Dinh VA, Dukes WS, Prigge J, Avila M. Ultrasound integration in undergraduate medical education: Comparison of ultrasound proficiency between trained and untrained medical students. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34:1819-24.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Day J, Davis J, Riesenberg LA, Heil D, Berg K, Davis R, et al. Integrating sonography training into undergraduate medical education: A study of the previous exposure of one institution's incoming residents. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34:1253-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bahner DP, Goldman E, Way D, Royall NA, Liu YT. The state of ultrasound education in U.S. Medical schools: Results of a national survey. Acad Med 2014;89:1681-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Rao S, van Holsbeeck L, Musial JL, Parker A, Bouffard JA, Bridge P, et al. Apilot study of comprehensive ultrasound education at the Wayne State University School of Medicine: A pioneer year review. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:745-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Gogalniceanu P, Sheena Y, Kashef E, Purkayastha S, Darzi A, Paraskeva P, et al. Is basic emergency ultrasound training feasible as part of standard undergraduate medical education? J Surg Educ 2010;67:152-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Bahner DP, Adkins EJ, Hughes D, Barrie M, Boulger CT, Royall NA, et al. Integrated medical school ultrasound: Development of an ultrasound vertical curriculum. Crit Ultrasound J 2013;5:6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Baltarowich OH, Di Salvo DN, Scoutt LM, Brown DL, Cox CW, DiPietro MA, et al. National ultrasound curriculum for medical students. Ultrasound Q 2014;30:13-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Badea R, Dudea S, Prosch H, Cerezo E, et al. EFSUMB statement on medical student education in ultrasound [short version]. Ultraschall Med 2016;37:100-2.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Patel NY, Riherd JM. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma: Methods, accuracy, and indications. Surg Clin North Am 2011;91:195-207.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hoppmann RA, Rao VV, Poston MB, Howe DB, Hunt PS, Fowler SD, et al. An integrated ultrasound curriculum (iUSC) for medical students: 4-year experience. Crit Ultrasound J 2011;3:1-2.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bell FE 3rd, Wilson LB, Hoppmann RA. Using ultrasound to teach medical students cardiac physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 2015;39:392-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ahn JS, French AJ, Thiessen ME, Kendall JL. Training peer instructors for a combined ultrasound/physical exam curriculum. Teach Learn Med 2014;26:292-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Yu TC, Wilson NC, Singh PP, Lemanu DP, Hawken SJ, Hill AG, et al. Medical students-as-teachers: A systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Adv Med Educ Pract 2011;2:157-72.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Dickerson J, Paul K, Vila P, Whiticar R. The role for peer-assisted ultrasound teaching in medical school. Clin Teach 2017;14:170-4.  Back to cited text no. 19
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Ultrasound Curricula of Student Education in Europe: Summary of the Experience
Helmut Prosch,Maija Radzina,Christoph F. Dietrich,Michael Bachmann Nielsen,Sven Baumann,Caroline Ewertsen,Christian Jenssen,Adnan Kabaalioglu,Wojciech Kosiak,Wolfgang Kratzer,Adrian Lim,Alina Popescu,Vladimir Mitkov,Cosima Schiavone,Martin Wohlin,Matthias Wüstner,Vito Cantisani
Ultrasound International Open. 2020; 06(01): E25
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1542    
    Printed76    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded179    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal