|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 47-49
Early detection of superior mesenteric artery dissection by ultrasound: Two case reports
Chun-Yen Huang1, Jen-Tang Sun1, Wan-Ching Lien2
1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
|Date of Submission||13-Aug-2018|
|Date of Acceptance||06-Sep-2018|
|Date of Web Publication||30-Oct-2018|
Dr. Wan-Ching Lien
Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan S. Road, Taipei 100
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) dissection is a rare disease. Most of the cases are diagnosed through contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The use of emergent bedside ultrasound has been described to diagnose aortic dissection. However, evidence is limited regarding the use of bedside ultrasound for diagnosing SMA dissection, which is a known risk factor for aortic dissection. We present two case reports: one case of isolated SMA dissection and one case of SMA dissection complicated with aortic dissection. Both cases were initially diagnosed through bedside ultrasound and confirmed through contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
Keywords: Abdominal pain, superior mesenteric artery dissection, ultrasound
|How to cite this article:|
Huang CY, Sun JT, Lien WC. Early detection of superior mesenteric artery dissection by ultrasound: Two case reports. J Med Ultrasound 2019;27:47-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Huang CY, Sun JT, Lien WC. Early detection of superior mesenteric artery dissection by ultrasound: Two case reports. J Med Ultrasound [serial online] 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 11];27:47-9. Available from: http://www.jmuonline.org/text.asp?2019/27/1/47/244528
| Introduction|| |
Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) dissection is a rare condition. In an autopsy series, the incidence of spontaneous isolated SMA dissection was 0.06%. SMA dissection was first reported by Bauersfeld in 1947. Some cases of SMA dissection are isolated whereas others are combined with aortic dissection. The causes of SMA dissection are fibromuscular dysplasia, cystic medial necrosis, and other connective tissue diseases; however, no specific underlying cause of SMA dissection has been identified in the majority of reports. Symptoms of aortic dissection are various and include chest, abdomen, or back pain; loss of consciousness; weak pulse in one arm; and lower limb paralysis. Abdominal pain is the main symptom of isolated SMA dissection, and in most cases, pain onset is sudden and located in the epigastric or periumbilical area. Treatment strategies include conservative management with or without antithrombotic therapy, endovascular therapy with SMA stenting, or open surgery. Some authors have suggested conservative management as first-line treatment for symptomatic patients whereas other authors prefer endovascular treatment especially for patients with persistent abdominal pain and favorable anatomy. Most SMA dissection cases are diagnosed through contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). Aortic dissection can be diagnosed through bedside ultrasound. However, evidence is limited regarding the use of bedside ultrasound for diagnosing SMA dissection, which is a known risk factor for aortic dissection. Herein, we present two cases: one case of isolated SMA dissection and one case of SMA dissection complicated with aortic dissection. Both cases were initially diagnosed through bedside ultrasound and confirmed through CECT.
| Case Reports|| |
A 46-year-old male presented with intermittent epigastralgia for 3 days. His blood pressure was 158/106 mmHg, and his heart rate was 79 beats/min. Physical examination revealed epigastric tenderness without rebounding pain, and all distal pulses of the lower limbs were intact. His medical history, laboratory data, and abdominal plain radiograph were unremarkable. Bedside ultrasound (Toshiba Nemio SSA-550A, Curve Probe, 3.75 mHz) revealed that the SMA had a diameter of 16.8 mm [Figure 1]. A faint intimal flap was also detected in the SMA. Color duplex ultrasound revealed thrombosis or the presence of a false lumen in the SMA [Figure 2]. A cardiovascular specialist was consulted, and SMA dissection was confirmed through CECT [Figure 3]. The patient's symptoms improved after anticoagulant use.
|Figure 2: Intimal flap in superior mesenteric artery (arrow) and color duplex revealed thrombosis or false lumen in superior mesenteric artery (left)|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed superior mesenteric artery dissection (arrow)|
Click here to view
A 46-year-old male patient visited the emergency department because of the sudden onset of consciousness change. His blood pressure was 97/56 mmHg, and his heart rate was 92 beats/min. Physical examination revealed a Glasgow coma score of E3M5V2; the pupil size of both eyes was 2.0 mm with positive light reflex. Gaze deviation to the right with right-sided limb weakness was noted (muscle power less than Grade 3), and pulses in the right-upper and lower limbs were all palpable but weaker than pulses in the left limbs. His medical history included hypertension and ischemic stroke. Recurrent stroke was suspected initially; however, abdominal ultrasonography was conducted due to relative low systolic blood pressure (97 mmHg). The intimal flap and false lumen in the abdominal aorta and SMA were noted in abdominal ultrasonography images [Figure 4] and [Figure 5]. The diameter of the SMA in CECT images was 10.2 mm [Figure 6]. A cardiovascular specialist was consulted immediately. After endograft surgery, the patient's consciousness recovered to baseline.
|Figure 4: Intimal flap in abdominal aorta and superior mesenteric artery|
Click here to view
|Figure 6: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed dissection in aorta and superior mesenteric artery, superior mesenteric artery diameter was 10.2 mm|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
SMA dissection is a rare condition. Most cases of SMA dissection are diagnosed through CECT, and they are rarely diagnosed through bedside ultrasound. To the best of our knowledge, only one case report of SMA dissection diagnosed through bedside ultrasound has been described in the literature.
In ultrasonography, dissection is diagnosed based on the detection of the intimal flap in the vessel. However, flap visualization is inconsistent. Occasionally, the intimal flap may be too faint to be detected through bedside ultrasound in real situations such as emergency settings. In our experience, if the diameter of an artery is extremely large, a diagnosis of dissection should be considered, even when the intimal flap is not detected through ultrasound. Dissection of an artery may result in thrombosed aneurysm, and the aneurysm is usually defined as more than 1.5 times of normal diameter. The normal diameter of the SMA has been reported as 5.7–7.3 mm in ultrasound images. Based on these diameters, we propose the diameter of a dissected SMA to range from 8.5 to 11 mm when SMA dissection is combined with aneurysm formation. To the best of our knowledge, no data on the diameter of dissected SMAs in ultrasound images are available. However, a study investigating 25 patients reported that the diameter of dissected SMAs ranged from 8 to 15 mm in CECT images. In our cases, the diameters of the SMAs were all more than 10 mm. Therefore, we suggest that in cases where the SMA diameter is more than 10 mm, clinicians should highly suspect SMA dissection and should perform additional imaging studies or consult a specialist.
Although SMA dissection can be successfully resolved through conservative treatment, it can also be complicated by bowel ischemia or even aortic dissection. Our two cases illustrate that bedside ultrasound can be used for the earlier detection of SMA dissection.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Foord AG, Lewis RD. Primary dissecting aneurysms of peripheral and pulmonary arteries: Dissecting hemorrhage of media. Arch Pathol 1959;68:553-77.
Bauersfeld SR. Dissecting aneurysm of the aorta; a presentation of 15 cases and a review of the recent literature. Ann Intern Med 1947;26:873-89.
Kim YW. Current understandings of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection. Vasc Specialist Int 2016;32:37-43.
Baldi S, Zander T, Rabellino M, Maynar M. Endovascular management of a spontaneous dissecting aneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery: Case report and discussion of treatment options. Ann Vasc Surg 2009;23:535.e1-4.
Davis CB, Kendall JL. Emergency bedside ultrasound diagnosis of superior mesenteric artery dissection complicating acute aortic dissection. J Emerg Med 2013;45:894-6.
Gouëffic Y, Costargent A, Dupas B, Heymann MF, Chaillou P, Patra P, et al.
Superior mesenteric artery dissection: Case report. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:1003-5.
Cruciata G, Parikh R, Pradhan M, Shah J, Greif E, Stein EG, et al.
Internal carotid artery dissection and pseudoaneurysm formation with resultant ipsilateral hypoglossal nerve palsy. Radiol Case Rep 2017;12:371-5.
Perko MJ. Duplex ultrasound for assessment of superior mesenteric artery blood flow. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001;21:106-17.
Zettervall SL, Karthaus EG, Soden PA, Buck DB, Ultee KH, Schermerhorn ML, et al.
Clinical presentation, management, follow-up, and outcomes of isolated celiac and superior mesenteric artery dissections. J Vasc Surg 2017;65:91-8.
Subhas G, Gupta A, Nawalany M, Oppat WF. Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection: A case report and literature review with management algorithm. Ann Vasc Surg 2009;23:788-98.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]