• Users Online: 2032
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 222-223

Perineal endometriosis: A rarity


Department of Radiology, Malabar Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India

Date of Submission21-Feb-2018
Date of Acceptance13-Mar-2018
Date of Web Publication07-May-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Reddy Ravikanth
Department of Radiology, Malabar Medical College, Kozhikode - 673 315, Kerala
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_31_18

Get Permissions


How to cite this article:
Ravikanth R. Perineal endometriosis: A rarity. J Med Ultrasound 2018;26:222-3

How to cite this URL:
Ravikanth R. Perineal endometriosis: A rarity. J Med Ultrasound [serial online] 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 18];26:222-3. Available from: http://www.jmuonline.org/text.asp?2018/26/4/222/247284

Dear Sir,

A previously healthy 28-year-old G1P1 woman presented with a 6-month history of a painful palpable lesion arising within the right perineum during menstruation. She delivered a year ago and remained well for 6 months before she started developing pain at the earlier site of episiotomy. She experienced cyclical pain and swelling at the site of the lesion. However, no bloody discharge was present from the scar site during menstruation. On examination, the episiotomy scar was seen on the right side of the perineum, and a hard subcutaneous nodule was felt at the previous episiotomy scar site. A clinical diagnosis of episiotomy scar endometriosis was considered. On transperineal ultrasonography, a focal hypoechoic lesion with small cystic spaces was noted in the subcutaneous plane of the right perineal region [Figure 1], measuring 3.0 cm × 2.8 cm × 3.2 cm, and a possible diagnosis of perineal endometriosis stated. The patient was taken up for surgical exploration through a transperineal incision. A cystic fluctuant swelling was seen in the deep subcutaneous tissue. The mass was excised with a rim of adjoining healthy tissue. Histopathology revealed fibroconnective tissue with many foci of endometrial glands and stromal elements [Figure 2] without nuclear atypia and the diagnosis of endometriosis confirmed. Postoperative follow-up was scheduled every 3–6 months to monitor any recurrence of the lesion, which was not reported by the patient. Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissues outside of the uterine cavity, is one of the most common diseases in women of reproductive age. Perineal endometriosis can be diagnosed on the basis of clinical features. Perineal endometriosis is often diagnosed late.[1] Endometriosis presenting as a tender nodule in the perineum could sometimes be felt only on deep palpation and many a times can be missed on superficial examination. Typical characteristics of perineal scar endometriosis have been described, which are elucidated as (1) Past perineal tear of episiotomy during vaginal delivery, (2) A tender nodule or mass at the perineal lesion, and (3) Progressive and cyclic perineal pain. If these criteria were met, the predictive value of perineal endometriosis was 100%.[2] Sonography due to its convenience and noninvasive character can be a useful modality for discovering the depth of invasion, nature, and precise size of the perineal mass. Magnetic resonance imaging can be used for the diagnosis of deep lesions. Treatment of extrapelvic endometriosis includes surgical intervention and hormonal suppression.[3] If hormonal suppression fails, surgical excision of the perineal endometrioma should be carried out. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists are the first-treatment choice in endometriosis. GnRH-agonists could effectively deplete the pituitary of endogenous gonadotropins and inhibit further synthesis, thus interrupting the menstrual cycle and resulting in a hypoestrogenic state, endometrial atrophy, and amenorrhea. Oral contraceptive pills and progestogens can be used either preoperatively or postoperatively.
Figure 1: Transperineal ultrasonography image demonstrating a focal hypoechoic lesion with multiple cystic spaces in the subcutaneous plane of the right perineum

Click here to view
Figure 2: Pelvic perineal biopsy demonstrating characteristic features of endometriosis, with endometrioid glands (arrows) surrounded by stroma (H and E, ×200)

Click here to view


Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Odobasic A, Pasic A, Iljazovic-Latifagic E, Arnautalic L, Odobasic A, Idrizovic E, et al. Perineal endometriosis: A case report and review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 2010;14 Suppl 1:S25-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Zhu L, Lang J, Wang H, Liu Z, Sun D, Leng J, et al. Presentation and management of perineal endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;105:230-2.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Toyonaga T, Matsushima M, Tanaka Y, Nozawa M, Sogawa N, Kanyama H, et al. Endoanal ultrasonography in the diagnosis and operative management of perianal endometriosis: Report of two cases. Tech Coloproctol 2006;10:357-60.  Back to cited text no. 3
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1397    
    Printed39    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded118    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal